Menu

M2M FEATURE NEWS

Regulators Prepare to Kill Smartphone Based Car for Hire Business

By Gary Kim November 16, 2012

Taxi and limousine regulators from 15 U.S. and Canadian cities plan to place restrictions on the use of smartphone applications and online services that allow people to find and use taxi services.

The story would be a familiar one for many veterans of the communications, broadcasting, cable TV and radio businesses, and a newly-heard story for technology industry participants. And that story is the foundational role played by regulations in enabling or barring a new industry from developing. 



Image via Shutterstock

The rules, created by a task force of the International Association of Transportation Regulators, would, for example, ban the use of a GPS-equipped smartphones in place of a taxi meter. Any experienced executive in the communications business could likely point to many instances where a regulator ruling on a technology matter had large business consequences for a service provider, or would-be service provider.

The rules would essentially kill Uber Technologies, and others like it, which use drivers' phones to determine the length and cost of rides. That appears to be a simple “technology” rule, but it also has business consequences.

The rule is, in some cases, and perhaps ultimately, about controlling entry into the business. The use of new smartphone based systems essentially undermines the licensing system used in the taxi industry. By banning the use of smartphones for metering, regulators also control entry into the business.

That is a hallmark of communications regulation as well, where a wide variety of rules, some based on technology, also prevent or enable contestants to enter the business.

The proposals also speak to retail packaging and pricing, another hallmark of communications regulation. The new rules would forbid "demand-pricing,” where fares for trips of equal length and destination could vary based on supply and demand.

As always, regulators will say the new rules are intended to protect the public from unfair fares and protect safety. The corollary is that the rules will protect an incumbent industry from competition that represents more consumer choice.

It’s an old story, indeed.




Edited by Brooke Neuman

Contributing Editor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

New Microchip Demo Platform Boasts Lowest Power BLE Sensor Node

By: Ken Briodagh    7/25/2016

Microchip Technology, a microcontroller, mixed-signal, analog and Flash-IP solutions provider, is claiming that it has the world's lowest-power Blueto…

Read More

Ingenu Announces Intellect IoT Platform

By: Ken Briodagh    7/20/2016

At the IoT Evolution Expo, IoT machine connectivity company Ingenu announced its brand new Intellect platform at the Battle of the Platforms.

Read More

Pitney Bowes Introduces SmartLink, Adds Cloud

By: Ken Briodagh    7/20/2016

Pitney Bowes, a global technology company that's made major moves into IoT this year, has announced the launch of the SmartLink device, a solution des…

Read More

Act Locally, Think Globally: A Practical Way to Look at IoT Opportunities in Retail

By: Special Guest    7/19/2016

Last week at the IoT Evolution Conference we caught up with Andy Asava, founder and CEO, Qualesce, a software development and systems integration comp…

Read More

Will Smarter, More Connected Workplaces Contribute to Better Business Outcomes?

By: Special Guest    7/13/2016

This week at the 16th IoT Evolution Expo, HARMAN was recognized with a Business Impact award for their innovations in developing connected workplace s…

Read More