Menu

M2M FEATURE NEWS

Regulators Prepare to Kill Smartphone Based Car for Hire Business

By Gary Kim November 16, 2012

Taxi and limousine regulators from 15 U.S. and Canadian cities plan to place restrictions on the use of smartphone applications and online services that allow people to find and use taxi services.

The story would be a familiar one for many veterans of the communications, broadcasting, cable TV and radio businesses, and a newly-heard story for technology industry participants. And that story is the foundational role played by regulations in enabling or barring a new industry from developing. 



Image via Shutterstock

The rules, created by a task force of the International Association of Transportation Regulators, would, for example, ban the use of a GPS-equipped smartphones in place of a taxi meter. Any experienced executive in the communications business could likely point to many instances where a regulator ruling on a technology matter had large business consequences for a service provider, or would-be service provider.

The rules would essentially kill Uber Technologies, and others like it, which use drivers' phones to determine the length and cost of rides. That appears to be a simple “technology” rule, but it also has business consequences.

The rule is, in some cases, and perhaps ultimately, about controlling entry into the business. The use of new smartphone based systems essentially undermines the licensing system used in the taxi industry. By banning the use of smartphones for metering, regulators also control entry into the business.

That is a hallmark of communications regulation as well, where a wide variety of rules, some based on technology, also prevent or enable contestants to enter the business.

The proposals also speak to retail packaging and pricing, another hallmark of communications regulation. The new rules would forbid "demand-pricing,” where fares for trips of equal length and destination could vary based on supply and demand.

As always, regulators will say the new rules are intended to protect the public from unfair fares and protect safety. The corollary is that the rules will protect an incumbent industry from competition that represents more consumer choice.

It’s an old story, indeed.




Edited by Brooke Neuman

Contributing Editor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Teradata Punches the Accelerator: Slow IoT Projects Move to the Fast Lane

By: Ken Briodagh    8/26/2016

Teradata, an analytics solutions company, has launched four accelerators designed to speed up the transformation of IoT data to actionable insight. Th…

Read More

Off the Blockchain: Chronicled Launches Open Registry for IoT

By: Ken Briodagh    8/24/2016

Chronicled, Inc., a San Francisco-based technology company, has launched an Open Registry for IoT, designed to encourage growth and interoperability i…

Read More

Senet and myDevices: Collaboration Evolves Connected Things

By: Special Guest    8/23/2016

Senet and myDevices last month announced a new technology partnership bringing a little extra spice to Senet's rapidly growing LPWAN U.S. network with…

Read More

Contract Manufacturers Add Value with Vertical Integration of Supply Chains

By: Special Guest    8/22/2016

As a contract manufacturer for some of the largest CPG companies in the U.S., when LiDestri Food and Drink goes looking to buy raw materials, more oft…

Read More

Top Questions to Ask When Looking for an IoT Platform

By: Special Guest    8/22/2016

SPONSORED CONTENT: Where to start when looking to choose a new IoT platform.

Read More