Menu

M2M FEATURE NEWS

Regulators Prepare to Kill Smartphone Based Car for Hire Business

By Gary Kim November 16, 2012

Taxi and limousine regulators from 15 U.S. and Canadian cities plan to place restrictions on the use of smartphone applications and online services that allow people to find and use taxi services.

The story would be a familiar one for many veterans of the communications, broadcasting, cable TV and radio businesses, and a newly-heard story for technology industry participants. And that story is the foundational role played by regulations in enabling or barring a new industry from developing. 



Image via Shutterstock

The rules, created by a task force of the International Association of Transportation Regulators, would, for example, ban the use of a GPS-equipped smartphones in place of a taxi meter. Any experienced executive in the communications business could likely point to many instances where a regulator ruling on a technology matter had large business consequences for a service provider, or would-be service provider.

The rules would essentially kill Uber Technologies, and others like it, which use drivers' phones to determine the length and cost of rides. That appears to be a simple “technology” rule, but it also has business consequences.

The rule is, in some cases, and perhaps ultimately, about controlling entry into the business. The use of new smartphone based systems essentially undermines the licensing system used in the taxi industry. By banning the use of smartphones for metering, regulators also control entry into the business.

That is a hallmark of communications regulation as well, where a wide variety of rules, some based on technology, also prevent or enable contestants to enter the business.

The proposals also speak to retail packaging and pricing, another hallmark of communications regulation. The new rules would forbid "demand-pricing,” where fares for trips of equal length and destination could vary based on supply and demand.

As always, regulators will say the new rules are intended to protect the public from unfair fares and protect safety. The corollary is that the rules will protect an incumbent industry from competition that represents more consumer choice.

It’s an old story, indeed.




Edited by Brooke Neuman

Contributing Editor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Splunk Incorporates Machine Learning Into New Releases

By: Ken Briodagh    9/27/2016

Splunk, provider of an Operation Intelligence software platform, recently announced new versions of its Splunk Enterprise, Splunk IT Service Intellige…

Read More

Pervasive Intelligence: IoT Human-to-Machine and M2M Interaction Challenges

By: Special Guest    9/27/2016

Current trends point to the emergence of a fantastic future in less than a decade.

Read More

Trimble Launches LoRa Water Sensors

By: Ken Briodagh    9/26/2016

Trimble recently introduced the new Telog 41 Series of wireless, battery-powered sensors for IoT water monitoring applications, using LoRa to remotely…

Read More

Cellular M2M Terminal Shipments to Reach 5.7 Million in 2020, Study Says

By: Ken Briodagh    9/26/2016

According to a new research report from M2M/IoT analyst firm Berg Insight, the number of shipped cellular M2M terminals were 2.7 million worldwide dur…

Read More

Australia and U.S. Take a Gigabit of the Pie-oT

By: Ken Briodagh    9/26/2016

The Government of South Australia, the Adelaide Gig City Initiative and US Ignite announced September 26 that Adelaide is to be the first internationa…

Read More