Menu

IoT FEATURE NEWS

Trump Budget Proposal Could Torpedo US Economic Growth, Think Tank Predicts

By Ken Briodagh February 27, 2017

Recent reports are indicating that the Trump administration is about to release a budget proposal that will mirror recommendations from the conservative Heritage Foundation, which will seek to slash trillions of dollars of federal spending. In a new report, the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) has warned that key aspects of the Heritage plan are premised on erroneous assumptions, empirical inaccuracies, and misguided leaps of logic, and adopting these particular proposals would severely harm U.S. innovation, productivity, and competitiveness.

ITIF, the top-ranked science and technology think tank in North America, concluded in its analysis that the country has suffered for more than a decade from chronic underinvestment in science, technology, education, and infrastructure. Further, the group said that crippling key functions of the federal government that support business innovation and competitiveness, as the Heritage blueprint would do, they predict, would only compound the damage.

“The administration and Congress need to recognize the difference between wasteful spending and critical investment,” said Robert D. Atkinson, president, ITIF, and the co-author of the report. “There are certainly federal programs that can be cut with little to no impact on economic growth. However, many federal programs compensate for serious market failures and play a pivotal role in ensuring the United States is succeeding in global economic competition. Unfortunately, Heritage dwells in a fictional world where market outcomes are by definition optimal, even if the winners aren’t on U.S. shores, and where government programs are by definition failures, even when there is evidence to the contrary. In the real world, we need to adopt a more nuanced, less ideological approach to put the U.S. economy, businesses, and workers in a position to flourish.”

The ITIF report breaks down Heritage’s doctrinaire errors in two major areas: trade and competitiveness, and energy and R&D. On the first, ITIF says the Heritage plan pretends that the United States and its industries are not in competition with other nations, because whatever the market produces is ideal by definition. This simplistic worldview, the report argues, ignores the fact that if the United States loses traded-sector output to other countries, then it will also lose jobs and face more expensive imports. As ITIF points out, conservative governors and mayors recognize these facts and promote state-level economic development programs to maximize the benefits of economic competition. Federal programs like the Export-Import Bank, Manufacturing Extension Partnership, and the U.S. Interagency Trade Enforcement Center complement these efforts, and cutting them as Heritage proposes would only diminish U.S. competitiveness further.

The proposed plan also ignores market failures like the lack of investment in technology commercialization, ITIF contends. While many of these investments do pay off, there is less than optimal private-sector activity because these investments are viewed as too long-term or risky. Programs like the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer initiatives, which Heritage suggested cutting, counter this market failure.

“The United States has suffered from private and public underinvestment for more than a decade,” said Atkinson. “Crippling key functions of the federal government, which would be the consequence of adopting Heritage’s budget, will set the nation back even further.”

With regard to energy and R&D, ITIF argues that by calling for the elimination of all climate-related programs and for massive cuts to basic R&D, the Heritage proposal blithely disregards the scientific consensus on climate change. This is not just bad environmental policy; it also makes no sense as an economic program, the report posits. The budget plan ignores biases in the energy market that favor incumbents and the complementary nature of public and private investment in this space. ITIF argues that if the United States fails to accelerate its progress toward cheaper, cleaner energy, then the pressure for a regulatory and tax response to reduce reliance on dirty energy will grow.

“America’s economic and energy challenges are too great for policy to be shaped by ideological extremists, either on the right or the left,” said Stephen J. Ezell, VP, global innovation policy, ITIF, and the report’s lead author. “Targeted federal government programs to help businesses in America are not crony capitalism. They are smart economic development programs, the very same kind that the most conservative Republican governors champion. To foster an innovative and competitive economy in a turbulent and sometimes hostile world, the U.S. government must use an array of tools, but use them judiciously. Heritage’s kit contains only one tool: the axe.”

Without true, forward-looking federal leadership, economic growth in the technological sector will inevitably be hampered, because so much of our sector’s innovative heart comes from public-private partnerships.




Edited by Alicia Young

Editorial Director

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

The IoT: Redefining Local Food Retail Tech and Green Initiatives

By: Lindsey Patterson    3/22/2017

As the IoT has become more common place, it has also become more affordable and less intimidating.

Read More

Huawei Announces Collaboration with Honeywell on Smart Buildings

By: Ken Briodagh    3/22/2017

At CeBIT 2017, Huawei announced that it is collaborating with Honeywell to bring to market smart building offerings that take advantage of the latest …

Read More

Connected Health Moves from Development to Use

By: Ken Briodagh    3/22/2017

Le Lab e-Sante has announced a large field-based study called UPDOCS to determine how ready medical professionals are to use connected health devices …

Read More

The Short List of Who Protects Companies Against DDoS Attacks

By: Special Guest    3/22/2017

So why is it that so many companies seem to think somebody else is responsible for protecting them against distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack…

Read More

IBM Watson Enables IoT Strategy Across Industry

By: Ken Briodagh    3/22/2017

IBM's famous Watson supercomputer is the dominant force in machine learning across the entire IT world, and the IoT. The company is also establishing …

Read More